Call for Price
A tort, in common law jurisdictions, is a wrong that involves a breach of a civil duty owed to someone else. It is differentiated from criminal wrongdoing, which involves a breach of a duty owed to society. Though many acts are both torts and crimes, only the state may prosecute a crime, whereas any party who has been injured may bring an action for tort. This action can be on the public or private side, either under administrative, or in Judicial (court). One who commits a tortious act is called a tortfeasor.
A person who suffers a tortious injury is entitled to receive “damages”, usually monetary compensation, from the person or people responsible–or liable–for those injuries. Tort law defines what is a legal injury and, therefore, whether a person may be held liable for an injury they have caused. Legal injuries are not limited to physical injuries but may also include emotional, economic, or reputational injuries as well as violations of privacy, property, or constitutional rights. Tort cases therefore comprise such varied topics as auto accidents, false imprisonment, defamation, product liability (for defective consumer products), copyright infringement, and environmental pollution (toxic torts), among many others.
In much of the common law world, the most prominent tort liability is negligence. If the injured party can prove that the person believed to have caused the injury acted negligently (or without taking reasonable care to avoid injuring others), tort law will allow compensation. However, tort law also recognizes intentional torts, where a person has intentionally acted in a way that harms another, and “strict liability,” which allows recovery under certain circumstances without negligence.
Torts may be categorized in a number of ways: one such way is to divide them
into Negligence Torts, and Intentional Torts.
The standard action in tort is negligence. The tort of negligence provides a cause of action leading to damages, or to relief, in each case designed to protect legal rights, including those of personal safety, property, and, in some cases, intangible economic interests. Negligence actions include claims coming primarily from car accidents and personal injury accidents of many kinds, including clinical negligence, workers negligence and so forth. Product liability (warranties and the like) cases may also be considered negligence actions, but there is frequently a significant overlay of additional lawful content.
Among intentional torts may be certain torts coming out of the occupation or use of land. One such is the tort of nuisance, which involves strict liability for a neighbor who interferes with another’s enjoyment of his real property. Trespass allows owners to sue for entrances by a person (or his structure, for example an overhanging building) on their land. There is a tort of false imprisonment, and a tort of defamation, where someone makes an unsupportable reason for arrest or their speech is not represented to be factual which damages the reputation of another.
Workers’ compensation laws were a legislative response to the common law torts order placing limits on the extent to which employees could sue their employers in respect of injuries sustained during employment.
Negligence is a tort which depends on the existence of a breaking of the duty of care owed by one person to another. One well-known case is Donoghue v. Stevenson where Mrs. Donoghue consumed part of a drink containing a decomposed snail while in a public bar in Paisley, Scotland and claimed that it had made her ill. The snail had not been visible, as the bottle of beer in which it was contained was opaque. Neither the friend who bought the bottle for her, nor the shopkeeper who sold it, were aware of the snail’s presence. The manufacturer was Mr. Stevenson, whom Mrs. Donoghue sued for damages for negligence. She could not sue Mr. Stevenson for damages for breach of contract because there was no contract between them. The majority of the members of the House of Lords agreed (3:2 ratio) that Mrs. Donoghue had a valid claim, but disagreed as to why such a claim should exist. Lord MacMillan thought this should be treated as a new product liability case. Lord Atkin argued that the law should recognize a unifying principle that we owe a duty of reasonable care to our neighbors. He quoted the Bible in support of his argument, specifically the general principle that “thou shalt love thy neighbor.” The elements in determining the liability for negligence are:
Defamation In the “McLibel case” two were involved in the second-longest case in UK history for publishing an article criticizing McDonald’s restaurants.
Defamation is tarnishing the reputation of someone; it is in two parts, slander and libel. Slander is spoken defamation and libel is printed and broadcast defamation, both share the same features. Defaming someone entails making a factual assertion for which evidence does not exist. Defamation does not affect or hinder the voicing of opinions, but does occupy the same fields as rights to free speech in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, or the European Convention of Human Rights’s Article 10. Related to defamation in the U.S. are the actions for misappropriation of publicity, invasion of privacy, and disclosure. Abuse of process and malicious prosecution are often classified as dignitary torts as well.
Intentional torts are any intentional acts that are reasonably foreseeable to cause harm to an individual, and that do so. Intentional torts have several subcategories, including torts against the person, including assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and fraud. Property torts involve any intentional interference with the property rights of the claimant(plaintiff). Those commonly recognized include trespass to land, trespass to chattels(personal property), and conversion.
Comments
Monard Mosley November 3, 2017 at 10:14 pm
Is the total $3000 fee includes the CAFV. Even if the CAFV is pertaining to a “post conviction” process?
Remedy November 3, 2017 at 10:14 pm
Fees for services are, case by case, dependent on what an individual needs to have resolved. This is why the review process is important to complete first. Upon completion the report will outline services needed.
Monard Mosley November 5, 2017 at 10:14 pm
Thanks, I’m working on submitting docs for the review!
Edward-L: Jackson November 12, 2019 at 10:14 pm
Does anybody know about [LAWFUL MONEY]?
And does anybody know about how to do the TAXES as a [SECURED PARTY CREDITOR]?
Remedy November 12, 2019 at 10:14 pm
Your question pertaining “Lawful Money” is both vague and really does not exist especially in the Debt System we operate in today. Please, present your question in a form that can be answered specifically rather than vaguely.
Also, an SPC should not be filing taxes as taxes are for income earned. Only the trust earns capital in order to grow in value for the benefit of the Beneficiary(ies) at a later time. Capital earned by the Trust is not income until it is received by the beneficiary(ies). The Trustees should be filing a 1040 or 1041 form in order to show what is coming into and out of the trust accounts.
Edward-L: Jackson November 20, 2019 at 10:14 pm
If the [Secured Party Creditor] has a JOB does the Secured Party Creditor file taxes before he became a Secured Party Creditor? I became SPC on 4/1/2019.
If the trust doesn’t have anything in it do you still have file?
Remedy November 20, 2019 at 10:14 pm
Yes, as they were a public citizen before becoming a private citizen and required to pay income taxes up until that point. As for the trust, the trust is still required to file the 1041 form to show what is coming in and going out. If there is noting then tell the IRS there was nothing and use their required forms to do so.
Edward-L: Jackson December 6, 2019 at 10:14 pm
Can you give more detail on how you deal with the IRS is a private citizen? and filing up to that point before I became a private citizen? Can you give information on the required form that let the IRS know that there is nothing in the trust?
Remedy December 6, 2019 at 10:14 pm
For the questions that you have presented you will need to give our office a call directly at (614)302-9752 Monday thru Thursday 9am to 5pm or Friday 9am to 12pm (EST). Thanks
Ryan Reid November 19, 2020 at 10:14 pm
I want to know how can I as a secured party creditor file a tort claim against the state of Georgia or the department of corrections for false imprisonment
Remedy November 24, 2020 at 10:14 pm
Please, give our office a call directly during business hours and speak to one of our representatives.Our direct number is (614)302-9752 and our business hours are Monday thru Thursday 9am to 12pm and Friday 9am to 12pm (EST). Thanks!