There is another set of Bonds and they are all put out by GSA = General Services Administration. I’m just talking off the top of my head because I have all of this stuff memorized. GSA Form SF24 is the “Bid Bond”, everyone should have a copy of the Bid Bond. The “Performance Bond” is SF25. The “Payment Bond” is SF25A and put out by the GSA.
O.K. So, what are they doing with these Bonds? What’s going on in the courtroom is that they are suing you for a debt collection. If you look at these Bonds, everyone of these Bonds: the “Bid Bond”, the “Performance Bond” & the “Payment Bond”, all have a “PENAL SUM” attached to it. The reason for the “Penal Sum” is if you don’t pay the Debt, you go into “Default Judgment”.
That is what is going on in the courtroom. That is why all of these guys are sitting in prison wondering what’s going on! If you go in and argue jurisdiction or refuse to answer questions that the judge or the court addresses to you, they will find you in contempt of court and they will put you in jail. What they do is arrest you, then they hold you, basically until the suit has been completed. Once they get “Default Judgment” on you because of your failure to pay the Debt, they put you in prison. The attorneys are there to "re-present".
What attorneys have been trained to do is to lead you into “Dishonor” or “Default Judgment”. Then the court puts you into prison then they sell your “Default Judgment”.
Who do they sell it to?
Believe it or not, the U.S. District Court buys all of these State Court Judgments. I don’t know why nobody has found this out before. There are about 300 “re-insurance” companies that buy these bonds. They are all ‘insurance” companies. These are the people that are buying these Bonds when you went into “Default Judgment” and they cannot buy these Bonds unless they are Certified by the Secretary of the Treasury.
What are they doing with these Bonds? They have regulations governing these Bonds – there are 2,000 regulations governing these Bonds.
Commercial Paper; Negotiable Instruments - anything you put your signature on is a Negotiable Instrument under the Uniform Commercial Code which is the Lex Mercantorium. Its Mercantile Civil Law.
The reason they use Lex Merchantorium in the court room is because everyone of you are Merchant’s at Law and Merchants at Law is anyone who holds themselves out to be an expert.Because you use commercial paper on a daily basis, you are considered to be an ‘expert’. This is also why they are not telling you what is really going on in the courtroom. You are presumed to know this stuff because you hold yourself out to be an expert by using commercial paper every day.
Every time you put your signature on a piece of paper, you are creating a Negotiable Instrument. Some are Non-Negotiable and some are Negotiable. Every time you endorse something, you are acting as an accommodation party or an accommodation maker under UCC 3-419.
An accommodation party is anyone who loans their signature to another party. Read UCC 3-419, it tells you what an accommodation maker is and what an accommodation party is. When you loan your signature to them, they can then re-write your signature on any document they want and that’s exactly what they are doing.
What the Federal Courts are doing is they are buying up these state court default judgments, called ‘criminal cases’ to cover up what they are doing. Actually, they are civil cases.
If you read “Clerk’s Praxis”, you find that what they call ‘criminal’ is all civil, they just call it criminal to cover up what their doing. If you don’t pay the debt you go to prison, bottom line.
I know I’ve been there. EVERYBODY IS FEEDING OFF OF THE PRISON SYSTEM: ALL OF THE MAJOR CORPORATIONS ARE FEEDING OFF OF THE PRISON SYSTEM.
Remember, everything is commercial. 7211 7 CFR says that all crimes are commercial. If you read that carefully it says kidnapping, robbery, extortion, murder, etc. are all commercial crimes. Thus, you are funding the whole enchilada simply because you got into Default Judgment when you went into court and failed to redeem the Bond.
This is why people don’t win in court; cause they don’t redeem the Bond. You are the Principal upon which all money circulates, but you don’t want to start arguing with the court about that.
They are drafting you for performance. So, anytime the court asks you to do something they are drafting you for performance and if you don’t perform, you get into dishonor by non acceptance.They are making a formal presentment under UCC 3-501 so they can charge you and they USE the word “charge”. They use the same commercial words on your Indictment, Information and Complaint. They use the word “charge”, i.e., “the following charges”, “…he has two counts of charges”, etc.
What you want to do is settle the account…go to full settlement and closure; you’re running the account, you’re the Fiduciary Trustee over the account – tell them what to do. You’re the Principal and owner of the account, tell them what to do – tell them you want full settlement and closure of the account. You have to do this from the get-go.
In order to win in court you have to redeem the Bond.
Judges and lawyers don’t understand commercial law. They do not teach commercial law at law school. They have a special school for them and it’s on a “need to know” basis. The law always assumes that you know, since you were doing this since you were born until you reach the age of accountability, which is 18 years of age or what they call adulthood. If your holding yourself out and using commercial paper on a daily basis, that legal definition makes you an expert or you wouldn’t be using it, so they presume that when you go into the courtroom you know all this stuff.
They have to give you an out. Whenever you create a liability, you always have to create a remedy. They’re on the Public side of the accounting ledger. You are on the Private side.
THEY WILL NEVER TELL YOU THIS STUFF!!
Comments
Micah Ford April 1, 2017 at 11:23 am
Does this go for divorce court as well? If so how do you redeem the bond? Ty
Remedy April 3, 2017 at 11:23 am
Divorces are to be filed under your Trust with a Ucc3 (Collateral Amendment). I believe you have more specific questions that you may want to contact Tort Division over. Our office number and hours our on our contact page.
Thanks
John rouse December 31, 2020 at 11:23 am
Hey fam I don’t have any problem with you using my original publishing but you must know what your talking about . Intentional and neglible torts can stem from this process and the true benefit comes when A fee schedule is applied before you start doing this process . This is my publishing and it was published 21 years ago . I was a teenager .
Remedy January 4, 2021 at 11:23 am
The information is good solid foundational information and accessible via the internet. If this information was originally yours, very good research and information. There was no intent to claim it as ours, we were only using the information to educate others in commercial transactions and how they affect the judicial system. Alot has changed in the Administrative Remedy Processes since this was first published by you and our team. Fee schedules are outlined in your Security Agreements now and a Legal Notice and Demand further gives power to enforce any injuries and damages obtained through the actions of others.
CC Coleman July 23, 2017 at 11:23 am
I would think you would make a Private Marriage Contract and try not to have a marriage registered with the State to begin with. The UCC would cover your assets and property (including pay for your work) in the eventuality of a State Registered Marriage ending in Divorce.
Remedy July 24, 2017 at 11:23 am
Ideally Yes, however, if you are filing divorce after becoming an spc then you would just file the finalized divorce paperwork under a UCC 3 into your Trust filing for public notice. This is of course the same procedure for a Private Marriage contract, the exception is that there is no need to wait for a court decision to do this. You would write out a private divorce decree, have both parties sign it with witnesses being present and then file it under your Trust.
Jason August 16, 2017 at 11:23 am
Can anything be done after one has already accepted a plea offer?
Remedy August 17, 2017 at 11:23 am
Any contract that is entered into can always be renegotiated. Especially, those contracts that are not fully disclosed and/or have adhesion contracts attached to them.
Yoseph B. September 29, 2017 at 11:23 am
how do we redeem the bond?
Remedy October 5, 2017 at 11:23 am
Please, explain what you mean by redeem? Are you speaking of cashing it? Also, what bond are you speaking of? Not all bonds can be cash in for monetary value. Can call us at (614)302-9752 and we can discuss this in more detail if you’d like.
Yoseph B. October 6, 2017 at 11:23 am
In the post it said that we lose in court because we failed to redeem the bond, my question was how do we redeem that bid bond, performance bond or whatever bond that needs to be redeemed once a human is arrested?
Remedy October 7, 2017 at 11:23 am
Retrieval of the debt note/Bond is done on the International Market through a well experienced broker.
Dean harting May 16, 2020 at 11:23 am
I got caught growing marijuana does it count for the bond for me can I use the bond
Remedy May 18, 2020 at 11:23 am
If you have a case then the court has already written the bond for your case. That’s how they get paid and yes the bonds can be retrieved. For more information, please, call our office directly at (614)302-9752 Monday thru Thursday 9am to 5pm or Friday 9am to 12pm (EST).
Ed October 1, 2020 at 11:23 am
But how? What’s the retrieval process?
Remedy October 1, 2020 at 11:23 am
Please, give our office a call directly during business hours and speak to one of our representatives.Our direct number is (614)302-9752 and our business hours are Monday thru Thursday 9am to 12pm and Friday 9am to 12pm (EST).Thanks!
Ricco February 15, 2019 at 11:23 am
I’ve sent in a the gsa bonds of 3 million to settle and close the case. And also the penal code say they can double this amount. Yet the case was never closed.How do I file taxes on them bonds? Because once money is tendered they are consider paid according to the penal code as well.
Remedy February 18, 2019 at 11:23 am
You, cannot file taxes on them. When you sent in “gsa bonds” did you sent in the ones attached to the case or did you try to write new ones. If you wrote new ones then they are not attached to the original case and that is why the case was never “closed.” You sent in a promissory note not, lawful tender, therefore did you file the paperwork that goes into the administrative side of the the court and the market that said notes were issued to? There is no interest … there is no tax refund on monies made by the government using their corporate entity that resembles your name… The bonds are private… You can’t use a private bond to create public currency.. You can not comingle public and private…
Karen Krach February 25, 2020 at 11:23 am
The judge denied my right to file counterclaim for post settlement and closure of account under public policy. What paperwork can I file to the administrative side of the court for post settlement and closure, whom or which office I Hawaii do I address? I would like to hire you to help me. My # is 3174134503. Many thanks
Remedy February 26, 2020 at 11:23 am
It was a pleasure speaking to you yesterday afternoon. We pray that your questions were answered and light was shed on some of the things you were learning. Anytime, you would like to continue our conversation, please, feel free to give us a call.
Bubbasue May 9, 2020 at 11:23 am
This is a great thread. The one wanting to file taxes on bonds has a claim in recoupment I believe. On public side may be able to file 1099oid, 1099a, 8381 etc
Remedy May 11, 2020 at 11:23 am
The 1099 OID process has put more people in prison than has helped. Please, remember that the “Bonds” are debt notes and the are not in the name of the living person. They are in the name of the debtor, you do not own the debtor EVER! If you are a lawfully Commercially Registered SPC you have commercially changed your status as the beneficiary of the Estate Trust created by the Government. In that process you have created a Bailors Trust which you are the Trustee of, you are NOT in control of the debtor. You are in control of the newly created trust which was created to change your commercial status and give you rights again. Those items, whether the Debt Notes (Bonds), the Treasury Direct Account or the interest associated with those items are not yours to collect from because they have never belonged to you. The Debtor/Strawman name is on them not your name, check the spelling. Also, those items are attached to a social security number which gave you privileges/benefits.
When you filed your Spc documents did you not file a change of fiduciary relationship form? You made the treasury collaterally responsible for the Strawman and all privileges assigned to the Debtor. You told them you wanted nothing from them you would handle all of your own affairs from now on. Why would they allow you to access their bank account and access their money? Remember, the debtor, strawman and estate trust is their creation, they own them and they are the trustee(s), you were always just the beneficiary who needed to ask permission to receive a privilege from them.
Before it gets said, it does not matter that it was done without full disclosure. They have all of the contracts to prove it was permitted with voluntary permission. You must discharge/undo every contract that the living man was attached to, as authorized representative, from the beginning. Becoming an SPC is just step number one. These contracts do not undo themselves automatically just because you’ve filed one set of papers. Each contract and each debt must be addressed individually.
To revisit the 1099 OID process, asking for a tax return on money that you did not earn and associated with an account that your are not the Holder-In-Due-Course of is TAX FRAUD! It is also, filings of falsified government documents and even Intent to commit fraud. The cases we have seen of individuals who have moved forward with a 1099 OID for interest or returns on the Bonds (including birth certificate bonds) starts with a prison sentence of 5 years. You do not have to agree with us, however, there is the facts you can research. There is no such thing as free money,.
John rouse December 31, 2020 at 11:23 am
The 1099 OID is trace evidence of the fraud . I’m sui juris impropria persona and own music seda k trust . And my treasury direct account . When you are autochthonous paleo American you own everything even the device creating the fraud and acting upon it. The Dajure government is responsible for the plenipotentiary and contracts agreed and produced by the indigenous of the America’s. Why we bask at claiming bonds the usc codes protect us from lack of substantive and procedural due process require effects of amendments. Even though they act in secret they are still subjunctive to violations of you so shall cite and notify the court of this very issue . Municipal courts don’t know shit and tend to not be involved in details so under title 28 ss 1331 take it out of local courts and place it on federal record . The magistrate can redeeem the bonds for you , and place the lower court in strict scrutiny and all this is Proper process . The only way to settle quickly cause to get any monetary benefit you have to file a claim for substantive breach unless your proclaimed and declared with a fee schedule . Once this occurs it’s a simple trip to the clerk and a check written . There is no extra process . It is if your a citizen of the District of Columbia (us citizen ) you have to do all this bid bond crap . As a natural man your straw takes the hit and can discharge debts using debt request or relief forms . The penal sum is irrelevant cause the bonds can only be written on laws involving due process backed by the crown copyright rule of law and for not processing the claim properly its treason and a writ of ejectment can be served on the agent . I shut down courthouses and lock judges up they want no parts of me on any level here in Baltimore . They say yes sir no sir how high u want me to jump through your hoops and how long .
Remedy January 4, 2021 at 11:23 am
The 1099OID process is fraudulent now and many individuals are currently sitting in prison (or waiting to go) from using the processes incorrectly. No individual can own their TDA as it is a U.S. Treasury Account established for the Corporate Entity known as the DEBTOR. Said corporate entity is owned by the “STATE OF” (your birth state or country) and set up as an Estate Trust. The Estate Trust Trustees are the Federal and State Governments and the living man was made to be the beneficiary. A beneficiary owns nothing and can only receive from the trust upon having permission granted from the Trustees overseeing the Trust. The Magistrate cannot obtain the “Bonds” because they no longer belong to the courts as they are sold on the International Trade Market within 72 hours of a default judgement against the corporate entity.
28 U.S.C. § 1331 is known as a Federal Question or Jurisdictional Challenge and can be used to challenge any void decision based on want/lack of jurisdiction. You cannot discharge a commercial debt if you are not the holder in due course of all of the original debt instruments (bonds) attached to the original account. Also, the U.S. Supreme Court is granting prosecutor and absolute immunity if you do not start in the original court the default judgement was issued.
If you were never documented as a U.S. “citizen,” your birth was not registered with any “STATE OF” or you were never Naturalized as a U.S. “citizen” under the 14th amendment then yes, you have other administrative remedies available to you.
blizzy don dada June 13, 2020 at 11:23 am
how do i ask for my bid bond i tried going to the court clerk and asking for my “bid bond” but they seemed to not know what that term meant
Remedy June 16, 2020 at 11:23 am
The clerk of the court does not have the bid bond. Once judgment was entered, the administrative clerk turned the judgment into commercial paper and then sold the debt on the international market. All debt notes pertaining to cases are on the international market, which takes an international broker to retrieve.
ROBERT B WEBER June 18, 2020 at 11:23 am
Robert Weber
Jun 8, 2020, 6:02 PM (10 days ago)
to IV-D Child Support crime family
I am dealing with the AZDES Child Support. I had not heard from them until my stimulus check from the CARES Act was taken by them. instead of a check, I got a letter stated that they were keeping it nad I owe them even more! I believe they had no right to do this. Here is a quick overview of a history of what I had to endure.
I have 100% fully financially and otherwise supported my kids. Child Support is stating that they are going to take 50 % of the unemployment if and when i put in for it. 1994 they had me and my gf come down and watch a video then had us sign some papers. We didn’t understand everything -we were young. I been back and forth I wouldn’t send Child Support any money I sent it to my gf. My credit report stated $27,000.00 at one point, still I did not give in to their corporate bastards.
All my life I have been harassed by them. I took care of my two kids financially. Jona,their mother, passed on going on two years ago and currently my daughter is 35 yrs old my son 32 yrs old.
Nov 9,2018 child support sent me in the mail letter presentment stated a past due amount $39,301.00 so on 3/22/2019. I Accepted for Value Exempt from Levy
A4V and sent it to the U.S. Treasury. On my credit Karma account DES CHILD SUPPORT collection closed Aug 25,2016 So until just resently they reported I owe them another $10,133.00. These corporations just can’t leave a man in peace. I got a letter by mail to call me in to talk to a person and I just say to her my kids are grown. In our conversation she slipped up and said that the two younger kids that are not my DNA they could not find their fathers. So I said I would try and if they reduced the amount into 1/3 because there is two other Fathers each one of the two younger kids. Well when I got there offer it was over $6,000.00. I did not sign and I started researching. Well they under this new offer of the $6,000.00 come back I didn’t autograph and sent in the contract. I requested an Administrative review.
With my researched document I invoked the Republic Law I reserve all my unalienable rights afforded to me by my creator (All rights Reserved) Stated Conditionally accept your claim on proof of claim you show me the contract with my wet blue ink autograph, not a copy.
I submitted I am not Subject to void IV-D Obligations.
Pennsylvania Cont. Article I. 1. All men are born equally free and independent and have certain inherent and indefeasible rights etc. Ohio Const. Article I. Inalienable rights 1851. New Jersey Constitution Article I.
Genesis 1:26 and God said let us create man in our image and likeness.
Kentucky Cont. Article I. 1. Definition of Your Inherent Rights. INHERENT POWERS. black’s law Rev.4th Ed. p. 631, Black’s law 4th Ed. p.791,
Black’s law 4th Ed. 911,
Black’s law Rev. 4th Ed. p. 1594.
OPPRESSION. The misdemeanor committed by a public office, who under color of his office, wrongfully inflicts upon any person any bodily harm, imprisonment or other injury. 1. Russ. Crimes, 297: Steph. Dig. Crim. law. 71. See U.S. v. Denver. D.C.N.C., 14 F. 597.
An act of cruelty, severity, unlawful excessive use of authority. Ramsbacher v. Hohman, 80 Mont. 480, 261 P. 273, 276, an act of subjecting to cruel and unjust hardship: an act of domination. Baker v. Peck. 1 Cal. App.2d 231,36P.2d 404, 406.
I am waiting on their reply for the Admin review. Is there a bond at the review? That I should ask them for and how do I proceed after asking for the bond?????
This is After what comes out of the Administrative review. I want to sue in Federal Court based on this law I found. What your Advise to me?? LAW: Morrison v. Coddington 662 P. 2d 155, 135 Ariz 480. I put that together with a copy of the presentment that I sent to the U.S. Treasury for closure of the $39,301.00. I have a copy of presentment as proof I A4V that on 3/22/2019 typed up an Exhibit 1 Insured Party bears the burden of proving (1) Fraud, and (2) Duress The Essential elements of this complaint and disestablishment of paternity on the basis of Fraud and Duress stems from _ About 6 Concealing information back in the beginning of Oct 20, 1994 thereabouts. And 6 kinds of threatening to the injured party criminally prosecuted, imprisoned, incrimination, giving up my DNA, drivers lic., to attend administrative non judicial hearings Like the one I got in the mail now they say I have a right to request an administrative review to dispute whether I am required to pay CS. But on 4/30/2020 they just intercepted my $1,200 stimulus saying that I owe Child Support listed Contact agency listed under Who Do I Owe.
421 U.S.C. 1983 civil action for Deprivation of Rights. I just don’t know how to find the forms and execute these typings I have on paper into a correct format and send to the Federal courts here in Phoenix, Arizona.
Thank you for your advice ahead of time.
Robert Weber© Holder in due course S.P.C.
DISCLAIMER: Anything was written or implied is not considered legal advice. This is a private email between the parties and not meant for public display. Any use of this communication without written prior consent will be deemed as a violation of my Private Security Agreement, Tradename, and UCC 1 on file. TRADENAME/COPYRIGHT: As per NY Filing: UCC1 201811200523016 file date 11-02–2018 anyone reproducing, using any form of my name, emails, etc. could be charged up to $50,000,000.00 per action.
Remedy June 22, 2020 at 11:23 am
Please, call our office directly at (614)302-9752 Monday thru Thursday 9am to 5pm or Friday 9am to 12pm. Thanks
Isaac September 21, 2020 at 11:23 am
State Administrative agencies are acting outside of constitutional purview and men are being summarily adjudicated by Police officers on the street for alleging oweing a civil debt called child support and they use the suspended drivers license in order to facilitate these false arrest and false imprisonments outside of the court! These agencies called DHS are facilitating action outside of judicial purview and I am aware that these traffic citations fall under the UCC and course they are calling these so called transgressions crimes without constitutional protections…These arrest are being based on presumptions and the Agencies are not obeying FDCPA Fair Debt Collections Practices Act because they are all attempting to collect a debt and profit from their own legislation and this is taking place at the local level with local police! End Result was arrest and then being forced to sign bonds for release under tha ALL CAPS ESTATE NAME..Surety Bonds by Sheriff and then Bail Bonds and also there are many associated fees that have nothing to do with the presumed charges! They are damaging the public and I want to go after their BONDS! Public Official Judge, Police, Sheriff and these agencies all have to have BONDS
Remedy September 30, 2020 at 11:23 am
Isaac,
State Administrative Agencies are following the public statutory contracts which have been entered into by two parties (“STATE OF” and the individual). Yes, these contracts should have been fully disclosed, however, the contracts are in place and enforceable in court nonetheless. When an individual records their birth certificate with the “STATE OF” they take on the roll of a beneficiary and have entered many “adhesion” contracts. As beneficiary this means, you must apply for a desired benefit via contract with the “STATE OF.” Should one take the time to fully read and interrupt the State Issued Drivers License Contract you would find that in the contract it states should you fall behind on any child support order you “agree” to have your license revoked and/or arrest by Policy Enforcers.
Going after the “BONDS” of these public officials for doing the job which they were hired to do is not the direction to go. You must cancel the adhesion contracts which were unknowingly entered into and replace them with new contracts which address your status as a private individual who is subject to the SUPREME LAW of the LAND. Yes, once you cancel the contracts you can then pursue claims for the unlawful actions of the individual who was attempting to enforce unlawful contracts. Just remember, for them its business, not personal and you are to be non-combatant as you handle your commercial affairs!
Charles May 15, 2021 at 11:23 am
Has anyone had success using the bonds to stay out of jail or prison?
Remedy May 24, 2021 at 11:23 am
If you are talking about attempting to write your own “bond” and submitting it to the court. You will have to establish notice of special appearance before going to court at least 10 days prior. Otherwise, the court will assume you are a public entity and not accept your bond because you are not “Licensed” to present “bonds” to the court.
David June 23, 2021 at 11:23 am
I’m going to court dwls. And haven’t finished the complete freedom self govern American natural man status process.. close. So I’m going to arraignment where I’m doing a conditional acceptance. I’m starting we does the court take judicial notice of judges oath of office, and as acting judge, not administrator.
Then before we can go any farther as beneficiary to the LEGAL NAME DEFENDANT, I demand (what) Bond to be brought forward immediately and placed on record to see who will indemnify me in case I’m damaged. Then if they have such Bond and the don’t and they place it on record ( there’s no injured party.) And I’ll use the UCC 1-103.6, that puts the court in a court of record. I just want to require the proper Bond to place on record for damages to me for bringing a false claims false arrest and the taking of private property for public use, to receive due compensation.
Remedy June 24, 2021 at 11:23 am
You can do this although, I have never seen “Bond” being placed on the official record. Mainly because, if you are still fighting the cause no “Bond” has been issued or assigned for the cause as of yet. Regarding the “Bond” attached to any oath office, that would already be in circulation with the International Trade Market and require an International Broker to retrieve. Oaths for officers of the court are supposed to be filed with the Supreme Court (State or Federal) after being administered.
If it were me, I would consider challenging the courts jurisdiction and having all evidence of facts placed on the official record.